Following the completion of my questionnaire, I needed to find a way of organising the responses that would allow me to analyse the data systematically rather than simply reading through each response individually.
I decided to create an Excel workbook specifically for the coding process. At this stage, I had collected 10 responses containing good qualitative information about participants’ experiences of travel.
Rather than placing everything onto one spreadsheet, I separated the workbook into different sections:
Keeping the raw responses separate felt particularly important. It meant I always had an untouched version of the original data to return to while allowing the Coding Workspace to become more experimental.
The purpose of creating this structure was not simply to make the data look organised. I wanted to create a clear process between collecting information and interpreting it.
My workflow became:
Raw Response → Initial Code → Related Codes → Candidate Themes → Refined Themes
At this stage, the later sections remain deliberately open. I do not want to decide what my themes are before I have properly analysed what participants have said.
Creating the workbook made the primary research feel much more manageable. Rather than looking at 10 complete questionnaire responses at once, I can now work through individual pieces of information and gradually identify connections between them.
It has also given me a clearer record of how my interpretation develops. This feels important because I want the eventual findings to be grounded in what participants actually told me rather than fitting their responses around assumptions I already have about autistic travel experiences.
The next stage is to begin coding the qualitative responses and see what patterns emerge naturally from the data.